Facebook, Google, MSM, Eugenics, Censorship and the Progressive Agenda

Recently Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook admitted to experimenting on its users without their knowledge. The nature of these experiments smells of Progressive Eugenics. This writer informed his followers of Mark Zuckerberg’s experiments on Twitter using the following Tweet:

Caught working on #Progressive #Eugenics Agenda again; Facebook Says It’s Sorry.We’ve Heard That Before http://nyti.ms/1mBqRKp @TweetCongress

Don Mashak on Twitter as @DMashak

“Facebook offered up an apology to its users on Sunday, after it came to light that the company had manipulated the news feeds of more than half a million people so it could change the number of positive and negative posts that appear from their friends. Facebook’s in-house data science team carried out the project, it said, as a way to examine the “emotional impact of Facebook” on its users. Along with two university researchers, the team published the results of the study in an academic journal.”

“Google, too, is familiar with issuing its own apologies, not the least of which includes an admission of inadvertently grabbing personal user information from unlocked wireless networks.”

You can learn more about the Progressive Movements foundations in Eugenics in these three articles:

• Eugenics & the Progressive Movement
• Progressive Movement & its Racist Eugenics Fabian Roots
• Progressives, President WoodrowWilson, Eugenics & Scientific Racism

This writer can only describe this activity of  Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook as creepy, Orwellian and terrifying. And yet, as this more recent article reports, this appears to be just the tip of the “creepy” Progressive Eugenics iceberg:

• 10 Other Facebook Experiments On Users, Rated On A Highly-Scientific WTH Scale http://onforb.es/1ni0HRS

Yet this is not the only way Facebook, Google and the Main Stream Media (MSM) are complicit in advancing the Progressive Agenda.  To being with, one must remember that Progressive Philosophy specifically maintains that Educated Elites have superior knowledge to the alleged ignorant masses and should be free to act because of their superior knowledge. However, in America they run smack into long standing traditions of individualism and the Democratic Process. And so the Progressives have to dance around this alleged intellectual superiority of the Educated Elites.

The real mass media are basically trying to divert people. Let them do something else, but don’t bother us (us being the people who run the show). Let them get interested in professional sports, for example. Let everybody be crazed about professional sports or sex scandals or the personalities and their problems or something like that. Anything, as long as it isn’t serious. Of course, the serious stuff is for the big guys. “We” take care of that.

Noam Chomsky 1997

Saul Alinsky, author of Rules for Radicals, also called for controlling the flow of information to the masses.  Level 6 of his 8 Leverls of Control to transform a Society to Socialism calls for:

5) EDUCATION: Take control of what people read and listen to, take control of what children learn in school.

Yet, news is not a priority to most Americans. Each of us rank and file Americans is preoccupied with our lives and a job that we need to sustain our life style.  And therefore, we must prioritize activities with what is left of our limited free time. 

“It is also in the interests of the tyrant to make his subjects poor… the people are so occupied with their daily tasks that they have no time for plotting.”

Aristotle

As a result, for the vast majority of us, only the news that is easiest to find and/or stumble upon, is the information we receive. And, as we have seen, our government and MSM uses their control of the information WE THE PEOPLE, to our detriment:

To make matters worse, the Progressive President Barack Obama Administration began pressing for even tighter control of the flow of information to the Public in 2012 and earlier this year:

• 2012 – White House gives Homeland Security control of all communication systems
• 2014 – FCC Wants To Spy On Newsrooms http://youtu.be/XJ31Jx9ZlLg Pls wake up America-More #Progressive Agenda, causing your submission by controlling info
• 2014 – 38 Journalism Groups Urge President to Stop Excessive Controls on Public Information

From these three sources and this writer’s two recent articles that immediately follow, this writer asserts as fact that our government is trying to control the information the masses recieve:

• Is Progressive Common Core simply pure evil?
• Who establishes Truth in America?

Before the Internet became well established, the elite MSM had pretty much perfected control of the flow of information to the masses.

The elite media set a framework within which others operate. If you are watching the Associated Press, who grind out a constant flow of news, in the mid-afternoon it breaks and there is something that comes along every day that says “Notice to Editors: Tomorrow’s New York Times is going to have the following stories on the front page.” The point of that is, if you’re an editor of a newspaper in Dayton, Ohio and you don’t have the resources to figure out what the news is, or you don’t want to think about it anyway, this tells you what the news is. These are the stories for the quarter page that you are going to devote to something other than local affairs or diverting your audience. These are the stories that you put there because that’s what the New York Times tells us is what you’re supposed to care about tomorrow. If you are an editor in Dayton, Ohio, you would sort of have to do that, because you don’t have much else in the way of resources. If you get off line, if you’re producing stories that the big press doesn’t like, you’ll hear about it pretty soon. In fact, what just happened at San Jose Mercury News is a dramatic example of this. So there are a lot of ways in which power plays can drive you right back into line if you move out. If you try to break the mold, you’re not going to last long. That framework works pretty well, and it is understandable that it is just a reflection of obvious power structures.

Noam Chomsky 1997

The net effect of this framework is that the elite at the top of the news and information pyramid control the flow of information to WE THE PEOPLE.  In current parlance, the Elite MSM “Spammed” America’s news distribution network. As a result, those of you with…..

To Continue reading for free, please click here http://exm.nr/1zK3hoW

Those were my thoughts.

In Closing:

Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.

If what is written here rings true to you, perhaps you should contact your local elected officials and let them know. If you are afraid of repercussions, snail mail it anonymously and ask them to respond in the local paper or their own monthly/quarterly internet newsletter. Even if this article refers to something outside you geographic area, it still likely applies to your location. Remember all those taxpayer training junkets we taxpayers send the bureaucrats on? They all learn the same “livestock management” techniques to use on WE THE PEOPLE.

And that leaves WE THE PEOPLE with this conundrum: While our #Government works full time with compensation and funded with our money for the cause of #Tyranny; WE THE PEOPLE are forced to work part time without compensation for the cause of #liberty with what is left over of our time, money and energy.

Finally, this article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I, Don Mashak, seek no leadership role. I, Don Mashak, seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar

Keep Fighting the Good Fight!

In Liberty,

Don Mashak

The Cynical Patriot

http://twitter.com/dmashak

http://Facebook/Don.Mashak (Warning, IMHO run by Progressives)

Don Mashak Google Plus http://goo.gl/1AUrE (Warning, IMHO run by Progressives)

WE THE PEOPLE TAR #WETHEPEOPLETAR

http://WETHEPEOPLETAR.blogspot.com (Google censored this blog by deleting)

http://facebook.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR

http://twitter.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR

End the Fed(eral Reserve Bank System) #ETF (Lupdate 7/9/2014)

National http://on.fb.me/U4YQo7 Minneapolis http://bit.ly/tjZJKF

Bring Home the Politicians #BHTP

http://BringHomethePoliticians.com

Lawless America #LawlessAmerica @LawlessAmerica

http://LawlessAmerica.com

Term Limits #TermLimit

http://TermLimits.org

Justice in Minnesota #JIM

http://JusticeinMN.com

Critical Thinking Notice – This author, Don Mashak, advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://exm.nr/Jkbfy6) in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this author, Don Mashak,… unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate you to the contrary of your perspective

Judicial Code Red defined by Don Mashak

The Truth About Judicial Code Red

Code Red Refers to any unwritten rule that is generally officially denied.

Code Red is a term from the movie “A Few Good Men”. In the movie, Code Red is a term US Marines stationed at Gitmo (Guantanamo Bay,Cuba) call physical punishment given out for a variety of infractions. As such physical punishment in this manner violates the military rules, officially it does not exist.

Judicial Code Red is/are the various unwritten rules that US Lawyers, Judges and Court personnel abide by.

Among the unwritten Judicial Code Red rules are:

1. Lawyers don’t  run in elections against sitting judges;
2. Lawyers not asking certain questions or doing certain things because they would be embarrassing to the court system;
3. Lawyers only allow to be put on the record evidence that will allow the Judge to rule in accordance with the desired results the judge has “telegraphed” to the Lawyers, even if this is against the best interests of their own client;
4. Lawyers, Judges & Court Personnel do not expose and/or testify as to the acts of judges or other lawyers that the general public might describe as unlawful, corrupt or an Abuse of Power.

There other unwritten Judicial Code Red Rules, but the foregoing 4 for the foundation for most of the other Judicial Code Red Rules.

These Judicial Code Red Rules are enforced through a variety of Carrots and Sticks.

The sticks are a series of plausibly deniable consequences for violating the unwritten Judicial Code Red Rules. These penalties/consequences for violating these various Judicial Code Red Rules vary in accordance to the severity of the perceived violation and the power of offended party. These various consequences may include black listing, social shunning, professional shunning, trumped up complaints, greater than usual punishment if a complaint is made against them, etc. Break the Judicial Code Red Rules and a lawyer will find winning his cases becomes much more difficult and rare. The simplest of mistakes which could easily be forgiven, suddenly always have harsh consequences for the lawyer who has dared to disregard the Judicial Code Red rules.

On the other hand, the carrots for conforming to Judicial Code Red Rules can be as simple as being left alone. Or, to reward compliance, the Carrots can include receiving referrals, government contracts, Professional Commendations, and/or promotions and advancement along with the money that comes with such carrots.

A fraternity of sorts has grown up around this Judicial Code Red.  Lawyers and Judges go to the same social functions, golf courses and country clubs. These relationships make plausibly denying the existence of Judicial Code Red and/or the consequences inflicted for perceived violation, that much easier to affect. In fact, the adversarial displays in the Court room is often as choreographed and orchestrated as TV’s Professional Wrestling. They are done more for the benefit and deception of the clients paying their respective lawyers, than they having any actual effect on the outcome of the litigation at hand.

The existence of Judicial Code Red has been a matter of contention in Minnesota Government hearings and judicial election debates. Since 2005(this is now 2014) 100s of Minnesotans each year have contacted the Minnesota House and Senate Judiciary Committees demanding a hearing dedicated to them receiving evidence and testimony of systemic corruption in the Minnesota Judiciary. And every year since 2005, the Minnesota House and Senate Judiciary Committees have refused.

There is no relief in going to the Minnesota Board of Judicial Standards nor the Minnesota Lawyer’s Professional Responsibility Board. Both are essentially “black boxes” who often complain that the Minnesota Legislature gave power limited to such things like untimely filings, bad personal hygiene, drunkenness and/or stealing of client and/or escrow funds. Most usually both of these Government organizations is to tell the complainer that their sole recourse is to appeal the matter to a higher court.  And most person can’t afford such an appeal, are physically and/or emotionally exhausted and/or don’t have the knowledge to file the appeal themselves.  Even worse, if there own lawyer has deliberately left evidence off the official court record, it can not be introduced upon appeal except in the rarest circumstance.

In Minnesota, Judicial Code Red is the reason why the vast majority of sitting judges that run for re-election, run unopposed.

And Judicial Code Red is one reason that corruption is rampant in the Minnesota Judiciary.

With no opponents running against sitting judges, there is no accountability via elections.

•  Example of Judicial Code Red used in a sentence:
• The Corrupt judges in Minnesota are protected from having to face reelection challengers via Judicial Code Red Rules, which they deny exist.

Those were my thoughts.

In Closing:

Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.

If what is written here rings true to you, perhaps you should contact your local elected officials and let them know. If you are afraid of repercussions, snail mail it anonymously and ask them to respond in the local paper or their own monthly/quarterly internet newsletter. Even if this article refers to something outside you geographic area, it still likely applies to your location. Remember all those taxpayer training junkets we taxpayers send the bureaucrats on? They all learn the same “livestock management” techniques to use on WE THE PEOPLE.

And that leaves WE THE PEOPLE with this conundrum: While our #Government works full time with compensation and funded with our money for the cause of #Tyranny; WE THE PEOPLE are forced to work part time without compensation for the cause of #liberty with what is left over of our time, money and energy.

Finally, this article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar

Keep Fighting the Good Fight!

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak
http://Facebook/Don.Mashak
Don Mashak Google Plus http://goo.gl/1AUrE

WE THE PEOPLE TAR #WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://WETHEPEOPLETAR.blogspot.com
http://facebook.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://twitter.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR

End the Fed(eral Reserve Bank System) #ETF
National http://bit.ly/ta3Rju Minneapolis http://bit.ly/tjZJKF

Bring Home the Politicians #BHTP
http://BringHomethePoliticians.com

Lawless America #LawlessAmerica
http://LawlessAmerica.com

Term Limits #TermLimit
http://TermLimits.org

Justice in Minnesota #JIM
http://JusticeinMN.com

Critical Thinking Notice – This author advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve) in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this author… unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate you to the contrary of your perspective.