Facebook, Google, MSM, Eugenics, Censorship and the Progressive Agenda

Recently Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook admitted to experimenting on its users without their knowledge. The nature of these experiments smells of Progressive Eugenics. This writer informed his followers of Mark Zuckerberg’s experiments on Twitter using the following Tweet:

Caught working on #Progressive #Eugenics Agenda again; Facebook Says It’s Sorry.We’ve Heard That Before http://nyti.ms/1mBqRKp @TweetCongress

Don Mashak on Twitter as @DMashak

“Facebook offered up an apology to its users on Sunday, after it came to light that the company had manipulated the news feeds of more than half a million people so it could change the number of positive and negative posts that appear from their friends. Facebook’s in-house data science team carried out the project, it said, as a way to examine the “emotional impact of Facebook” on its users. Along with two university researchers, the team published the results of the study in an academic journal.”

“Google, too, is familiar with issuing its own apologies, not the least of which includes an admission of inadvertently grabbing personal user information from unlocked wireless networks.”

You can learn more about the Progressive Movements foundations in Eugenics in these three articles:

This writer can only describe this activity of  Mark Zuckerberg’s Facebook as creepy, Orwellian and terrifying. And yet, as this more recent article reports, this appears to be just the tip of the “creepy” Progressive Eugenics iceberg:

Yet this is not the only way Facebook, Google and the Main Stream Media (MSM) are complicit in advancing the Progressive Agenda.  To being with, one must remember that Progressive Philosophy specifically maintains that Educated Elites have superior knowledge to the alleged ignorant masses and should be free to act because of their superior knowledge. However, in America they run smack into long standing traditions of individualism and the Democratic Process. And so the Progressives have to dance around this alleged intellectual superiority of the Educated Elites.

The real mass media are basically trying to divert people. Let them do something else, but don’t bother us (us being the people who run the show). Let them get interested in professional sports, for example. Let everybody be crazed about professional sports or sex scandals or the personalities and their problems or something like that. Anything, as long as it isn’t serious. Of course, the serious stuff is for the big guys. “We” take care of that.

Noam Chomsky 1997

Saul Alinsky, author of Rules for Radicals, also called for controlling the flow of information to the masses.  Level 6 of his 8 Leverls of Control to transform a Society to Socialism calls for:

5) EDUCATION: Take control of what people read and listen to, take control of what children learn in school.

Yet, news is not a priority to most Americans. Each of us rank and file Americans is preoccupied with our lives and a job that we need to sustain our life style.  And therefore, we must prioritize activities with what is left of our limited free time. 

“It is also in the interests of the tyrant to make his subjects poor… the people are so occupied with their daily tasks that they have no time for plotting.”

Aristotle

As a result, for the vast majority of us, only the news that is easiest to find and/or stumble upon, is the information we receive. And, as we have seen, our government and MSM uses their control of the information WE THE PEOPLE, to our detriment:

To make matters worse, the Progressive President Barack Obama Administration began pressing for even tighter control of the flow of information to the Public in 2012 and earlier this year:

From these three sources and this writer’s two recent articles that immediately follow, this writer asserts as fact that our government is trying to control the information the masses recieve:

Before the Internet became well established, the elite MSM had pretty much perfected control of the flow of information to the masses.

The elite media set a framework within which others operate. If you are watching the Associated Press, who grind out a constant flow of news, in the mid-afternoon it breaks and there is something that comes along every day that says “Notice to Editors: Tomorrow’s New York Times is going to have the following stories on the front page.” The point of that is, if you’re an editor of a newspaper in Dayton, Ohio and you don’t have the resources to figure out what the news is, or you don’t want to think about it anyway, this tells you what the news is. These are the stories for the quarter page that you are going to devote to something other than local affairs or diverting your audience. These are the stories that you put there because that’s what the New York Times tells us is what you’re supposed to care about tomorrow. If you are an editor in Dayton, Ohio, you would sort of have to do that, because you don’t have much else in the way of resources. If you get off line, if you’re producing stories that the big press doesn’t like, you’ll hear about it pretty soon. In fact, what just happened at San Jose Mercury News is a dramatic example of this. So there are a lot of ways in which power plays can drive you right back into line if you move out. If you try to break the mold, you’re not going to last long. That framework works pretty well, and it is understandable that it is just a reflection of obvious power structures.

Noam Chomsky 1997

The net effect of this framework is that the elite at the top of the news and information pyramid control the flow of information to WE THE PEOPLE.  In current parlance, the Elite MSM “Spammed” America’s news distribution network. As a result, those of you with…..

To Continue reading for free, please click here http://exm.nr/1zK3hoW

Those were my thoughts.

In Closing:

Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.

If what is written here rings true to you, perhaps you should contact your local elected officials and let them know. If you are afraid of repercussions, snail mail it anonymously and ask them to respond in the local paper or their own monthly/quarterly internet newsletter. Even if this article refers to something outside you geographic area, it still likely applies to your location. Remember all those taxpayer training junkets we taxpayers send the bureaucrats on? They all learn the same “livestock management” techniques to use on WE THE PEOPLE.

And that leaves WE THE PEOPLE with this conundrum: While our #Government works full time with compensation and funded with our money for the cause of #Tyranny; WE THE PEOPLE are forced to work part time without compensation for the cause of #liberty with what is left over of our time, money and energy.

Finally, this article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I, Don Mashak, seek no leadership role. I, Don Mashak, seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar

Keep Fighting the Good Fight!

In Liberty,

Don Mashak

The Cynical Patriot

http://twitter.com/dmashak

http://Facebook/Don.Mashak (Warning, IMHO run by Progressives)

Don Mashak Google Plus http://goo.gl/1AUrE (Warning, IMHO run by Progressives)

WE THE PEOPLE TAR #WETHEPEOPLETAR

http://WETHEPEOPLETAR.blogspot.com (Google censored this blog by deleting)

http://facebook.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR

http://twitter.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR

End the Fed(eral Reserve Bank System) #ETF (Lupdate 7/9/2014)

National http://on.fb.me/U4YQo7 Minneapolis http://bit.ly/tjZJKF

Bring Home the Politicians #BHTP

http://BringHomethePoliticians.com

Lawless America #LawlessAmerica @LawlessAmerica

http://LawlessAmerica.com

Term Limits #TermLimit

http://TermLimits.org

Justice in Minnesota #JIM

http://JusticeinMN.com

Critical Thinking Notice – This author, Don Mashak, advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://exm.nr/Jkbfy6) in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this author, Don Mashak,… unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate you to the contrary of your perspective

Advertisements

Plausible Deniability Standard of Morality defined by Don Mashak

ImagePlausible deniability originally was a legal concept. It referred to lack of evidence proving a allegation of a legal nature. Standards of of Proof vary in civil and criminal cases. In civil cases, the standard of proof is “more likely so than not” whereas in a criminal matter, the standard is “beyond a reasonable doubt” If your opponent/accuser lacks incontrovertible proof (evidence) of their allegation, you can “plausibly deny” the allegation even though it may be true. Plausible meaning believable.Because many lawyers are in politics, they brought this higher standard proof with them diminishing the morality, ethics and integrity of government.This has evolved into the current government Standard of Morality. It has evolved to include a denial of blame as well as a denial of guilt.

 

Most of us in America are taught and instilled with a Moral Standard of Absolute Right and Wrong. That is to say, that as we go through life we have a per-conceived notion as to whether anything we do or say is “right” or “wrong”. (Think fable of  George Washington’s “I cannot tell a lie, I chopped down the Cherry Tree”)And, for the most part, the majority of us go through life with an inner compass of knowing right and wrong, and presume that most other persons, especially those we trust, have the same or very similar Moral compass.

 

However, Elected Officials, Government Officials and Lawyers adopted a different, more flexible, Moral Standard.  Almost all of these aforementioned persons approach everything with a “what can I plausibly deny” Moral Standard. That is to say, these folks do a “reward vs likelihood of being caught” calculation/assessment in assessing virtually everything they do. Further, these people then take steps to minimize the likelihood of them being caught before, during the actual act.  And the destruction of evidence is an attempt to create plausible deniablity after the act has been discovered or alleged. (e.g. Missing IRS emails 2014)

 

This is why they rarely put anything controversial in writing. This is why if they are forced to put something in writing, it is usually in the form of a form letter. This is also why they most often have you talk to an underling or an agency bureaucrat so they can plausibly deny knowledge of the conversation or be able to say the underling or bureaucrat mis-stated their position. In the Courts of the State of Minnesota and many other states, members of the audience are prohibited from recording (video or audio) while court is in session. (Yes, you can ask permission but then 1) it is usually denied 2)The Court is put on notice that it must be more vigilant in what it says and does) In this way, only the court reporters transcript evidences the record and such documents can and are often altered to remove evidence that otherwise could not plausibly be denied.

 

Elected officials and high ranking government bureaucrats also build plausibility right into the hierarchy of their office.  Senators and Representatives have a chief of staff (who doews not have to face election) that handles most of the activities that must be “plausibly denied”.  Another example is the US Department of Justice Attorney General taking the political heat for decisions not to pursue certain criminals(like banksters and IRS officials who discriminated against conservative groups)  Sheriff’s Departments often utilize a Deputy Sheriff for such persons.  In this way, the elected official can deny knowledge and/or culpability for their underlings. And, in the worst case scenario, the unelected second in command, can take the fall with the understanding that they will “be taken care of” as understood quid pro quo.

 

Yet there is an dire consequence to America that results from this Morality of Plausible Deniability.  Each of us who have been indoctrinated with a moral standard of absolute right and wrong are handicapped when dealing with a person who practices a Moral Standard of Plausible Deniability. Folks that practice a Moral Standard of Plausible Deniability do not wear signs disclosing such.  Therefore, until our presumption that another person adheres to a same or similar moral standard as our own is proven wrong, we presume that their Moral Standard is the same as our own.

 

And, as a result of the nature of our interactions with Politicians and Government Officials, awareness of their betrayals may take a long time to realize. Whereas the Moral Standard of a person that cheats you on a car or some other personal interaction is quick and apparent, betrayals of trust by Politicians and Government Officials are more usually not that speedily apparent. In fact, an American Citizen that only interacts with a politician socially or one or two times more personally will likely never ponder, let alone deduce, whether said politician has betrayed their trust or not.
This has been hard to define than I anticipated.  I would appreciate any feed back to refine this definition.

 

Example:

 

President Bill Clinton practiced a Moral Standard of Plausible Deniability as demonstrated in his responses about Whitewater and Monica Lewinsky. For example, before the blue, semen stained dress was found, Bill Clinton believed he could plausibly deny having sex with “that woman” and, therefore, denied the allegations. Bill Clinton also tried to plausibly deny he had sex with Ms. Lewinsky by trying to assert that “oral sex was not sex”, and therefore he did not lie under oath. In another act meant to create plausible deniability, then President Clinton had his “bagman” Al Gore go to the Tibetan “Vow of Poverty” Temple to pick up a brief case containing $100,000.00 in illegal campaign contributions eventually traced to Red China.  It is alleged that the $100,000.oo was the pay off for President Clinton orchestrating access to the Red Chinese to our GPS and Rocket Stabilizer Gyro technology.  Technology which now allows Red China to successfully target mainland USA with which was previously its wobbly, crash and burn long range rockets.

 

President Richard Nixon practiced the Moral Standard of Plausible Deniability when he stated “I am not a crook” when confronted with the Watergate Scandal. President Nixon then resigned and by act of his appointed successor President Gerald Ford never had to testify under oath and therefore could continue to plausibly allegations about his role in the Watergate break in.

 

 
Those were my thoughts.

In Closing:

Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking your valuable time to read and reflect upon what is written here.

If what is written here rings true to you, perhaps you should contact your local elected officials and let them know. If you are afraid of repercussions, snail mail it anonymously and ask them to respond in the local paper or their own monthly/quarterly internet newsletter. Even if this article refers to something outside you geographic area, it still likely applies to your location. Remember all those taxpayer training junkets we taxpayers send the bureaucrats on? They all learn the same “livestock management” techniques to use on WE THE PEOPLE.

And that leaves WE THE PEOPLE with this conundrum: While our #Government works full time with compensation and funded with our money for the cause of #Tyranny; WE THE PEOPLE are forced to work part time without compensation for the cause of #liberty with what is left over of our time, money and energy.

Finally, this article is written with the same intentions as Thomas Paine http://ushistory.org/paine. I, Don Mashak, seek no leadership role. I, Don Mashak, seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense” http://amzn.to/kbRuar

Keep Fighting the Good Fight!

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot
http://twitter.com/dmashak
http://Facebook/Don.Mashak
Don Mashak Google Plus http://goo.gl/1AUrE

WE THE PEOPLE TAR #WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://WETHEPEOPLETAR.blogspot.com
http://facebook.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR
http://twitter.com/WETHEPEOPLETAR

End the Fed(eral Reserve Bank System) #ETF
National http://bit.ly/ta3Rju Minneapolis http://bit.ly/tjZJKF

Bring Home the Politicians #BHTP
http://BringHomethePoliticians.com

Lawless America #LawlessAmerica
http://LawlessAmerica.com

Term Limits #TermLimit
http://TermLimits.org

Justice in Minnesota #JIM
http://JusticeinMN.com

Critical Thinking Notice – This author, Don Mashak, advises you as no politician would dare. Exercise Critical Thinking (http://bit.ly/ubI6ve) in determining the truthfulness of anything you read or hear. Do not passively accept nor believe anything anyone tells you, including this author, Don Mashak,… unless and until you verify it yourself with sources you trust and could actively defend your perspective to anyone who might debate you to the contrary of your perspective.